Abstract

We investigate the impact of peer interaction on the quality of financial decision making in a laboratory experiment. Face-to-face communication with a randomly assigned peer significantly improves the quality of subsequent private decisions even though simple mimicry would have the opposite effect.

We present evidence that the mechanism involves general conceptual learning, and that the most effective learning relationships are horizontal rather than vertical. The benefits of demonstrably effective financial education do not propagate to peers.

Materials

PDFPublished version Media Wall Street Journal coverage MarketWatch coverage Plain text version

Machine-Readable Metadata

This page includes Schema.org ScholarlyArticle JSON-LD and alternate links in the HTML head for Markdown, LaTeX source bundles, Word-source text, and plain text when available.